Cisco (CSCO) — Daily Price Character

Historical session stats from dividend-adjusted prices: win rate, streaks, record days, weekday patterns, and (when available) how often the stock was green on S&P 500 green days.

Daily streak leaderboard →

Cisco Systems, Inc. logo
Cisco

CSCO

Archetype

Balanced

Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

Win rate

50.6%

4607 green · 4162 red · 329 flat · 9098 sessions

Current streak

5 green

As of Apr 7, 2026

Max win / lose streak

11 / 9 days

Win streak return: +8.09% · Lose: 4.97%

Median / σ daily

+0.050% · 2.458%

Avg green +1.74% · avg red 1.69%

Extreme days (>3%)

15.3%

744 up · 646 down

History from Feb 20, 1990 through Apr 7, 2026 · 9098 trading days with returns.

Trailing year — daily returns (calendar)

Apr 8, 2025Apr 7, 2026 · Mon–Fri sessions only

Monday–Friday — average return

Average dividend-adjusted return on that weekday (green / red by sign). Green/red day rule: ±0.01% vs prior close.

Monday–Friday — win rate

Share of sessions that closed green on that weekday. Bars are green at or above 50%, red below 50%.

Top green days

Largest single-session gains (dividend-adjusted), by historical return.

DateReturn
May 8, 2002+24.41%
Jan 3, 2001+23.97%
Oct 3, 2001+21.48%
Apr 2, 1991+16.85%
Apr 17, 2000+16.66%
Aug 11, 2011+15.94%
Aug 9, 2006+14.45%
Dec 5, 2000+13.80%
Oct 28, 2008+13.79%
Mar 13, 2001+13.69%
Mar 13, 2020+13.37%
May 21, 2001+13.21%
Nov 8, 1990+12.91%
May 16, 2013+12.66%
Oct 13, 2000+12.53%
Jul 29, 2002+12.52%
May 2, 2001+12.29%
Oct 31, 2000+12.13%
Feb 23, 2000+11.84%
Oct 13, 2008+11.81%

Worst red days

Largest single-session losses; "Days to recovery" counts trading sessions until close recovered the prior peak (dividend-adjusted).

DateReturnDays to recovery
May 13, 199419.55%115
Jul 14, 199417.29%24
Nov 11, 201016.18%630
Feb 10, 201114.20%502
May 19, 202213.73%62
Aug 31, 199813.57%10
Oct 5, 199813.27%8
Feb 7, 200113.11%3897
Mar 28, 200113.10%15
Jan 2, 200112.90%1
Dec 20, 200012.59%9
Jan 5, 200112.52%8
Feb 12, 202612.32%
Jul 25, 200211.31%2
Aug 13, 202011.20%121
Nov 14, 201310.97%124
Dec 18, 200010.85%4289
Oct 16, 200210.80%4
Jun 23, 199410.69%4
Oct 15, 200810.64%3

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily win rate for Cisco (CSCO)?

Historically, Cisco (CSCO) closed green on 50.6% of trading days (4607 green, 4162 red, 329 flat), using dividend-adjusted closes and a ±0.01% threshold for green vs red.

What is the current winning or losing streak for Cisco (CSCO)?

As of 2026-04-07, Cisco (CSCO) is on a 5-day winning streak (consecutive green or red days by the same rules, ignoring trailing flat days).

What does Steady, Balanced, or Explosive mean for Cisco (CSCO)?

We label Cisco (CSCO) as "balanced" based on the sample standard deviation of daily returns: Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

What were the best and worst single trading days for Cisco (CSCO)?

Largest single-day gain: +24.41%. Largest single-day loss: 19.55%. Tables on this page list the top record green and red days.

What counts as an "extreme" daily move for Cisco (CSCO)?

We treat a day as extreme if the absolute dividend-adjusted daily return exceeds 3%. About 15.3% of trading days for Cisco (CSCO) were extreme (744 up, 646 down).

Data & methodology

How are green, red, and flat days defined?

We use dividend-adjusted (or close-to-close for non-equity) daily returns. Green: return ≥ +0.01%. Red: return ≤ −0.01%. Flat: between those bounds.

How is the current streak calculated?

We count consecutive green or consecutive red days using the same thresholds. If the most recent session is flat, we skip trailing flat days and measure from the last non-flat close.

What does “vs S&P 500” mean?

On sessions where the S&P 500 (^GSPC) was green, we report how often this stock was also green. Shown only for USD equities when benchmark data exists and the symbol is not the index itself.

Where does the archetype come from?

Sample standard deviation of daily returns: low → Steady, high → Explosive, otherwise Balanced. Labels describe typical daily volatility, not quality of the investment.