Salesforce (CRM) — Daily Price Character

Historical session stats from dividend-adjusted prices: win rate, streaks, record days, weekday patterns, and (when available) how often the stock was green on S&P 500 green days.

Daily streak leaderboard →

Archetype

Explosive

High daily volatility — frequent large price swings.

Win rate

50.8%

2782 green · 2637 red · 62 flat · 5481 sessions

Current streak

2 red

As of Apr 7, 2026

Max win / lose streak

11 / 8 days

Win streak return: +12.42% · Lose: 17.30%

Median / σ daily

+0.050% · 2.619%

Avg green +1.85% · avg red 1.74%

Extreme days (>3%)

16.8%

471 up · 449 down

History from Jun 24, 2004 through Apr 7, 2026 · 5481 trading days with returns.

Trailing year — daily returns (calendar)

Apr 8, 2025Apr 7, 2026 · Mon–Fri sessions only

Monday–Friday — average return

Average dividend-adjusted return on that weekday (green / red by sign). Green/red day rule: ±0.01% vs prior close.

Monday–Friday — win rate

Share of sessions that closed green on that weekday. Bars are green at or above 50%, red below 50%.

Top green days

Largest single-session gains (dividend-adjusted), by historical return.

DateReturn
Aug 26, 2020+26.04%
Nov 24, 2008+19.24%
Aug 17, 2006+19.17%
Nov 19, 2010+18.15%
Feb 28, 2008+17.17%
Aug 20, 2010+16.97%
Aug 21, 2009+16.21%
Oct 13, 2008+15.92%
Aug 17, 2004+12.92%
Nov 16, 2007+12.91%
Feb 18, 2005+12.89%
Oct 28, 2008+12.80%
Feb 3, 2009+12.61%
Aug 30, 2013+12.57%
Nov 13, 2008+12.48%
May 19, 2005+12.02%
Dec 8, 2008+11.82%
Feb 26, 2015+11.74%
Apr 29, 2015+11.59%
Mar 2, 2023+11.50%

Worst red days

Largest single-session losses; "Days to recovery" counts trading sessions until close recovered the prior peak (dividend-adjusted).

DateReturnDays to recovery
Jul 21, 200427.27%39
May 30, 202419.74%81
Aug 21, 200818.47%311
Mar 16, 202015.89%6
Nov 18, 200414.56%134
Oct 15, 200813.87%108
Feb 5, 201612.92%13
Dec 1, 202111.74%541
Sep 29, 200811.59%226
Oct 7, 200811.12%138
Feb 10, 200610.91%21
Nov 18, 201110.02%56
Aug 18, 20119.71%7
Dec 4, 20089.58%2
Feb 6, 20089.21%3
May 10, 20129.08%7
Nov 12, 20089.08%1
Mar 12, 20209.04%10
Dec 11, 20088.89%16
Aug 5, 20048.81%9

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily win rate for Salesforce (CRM)?

Historically, Salesforce (CRM) closed green on 50.8% of trading days (2782 green, 2637 red, 62 flat), using dividend-adjusted closes and a ±0.01% threshold for green vs red.

What is the current winning or losing streak for Salesforce (CRM)?

As of 2026-04-07, Salesforce (CRM) is on a 2-day losing streak (consecutive green or red days by the same rules, ignoring trailing flat days).

What does Steady, Balanced, or Explosive mean for Salesforce (CRM)?

We label Salesforce (CRM) as "explosive" based on the sample standard deviation of daily returns: High daily volatility — frequent large price swings.

What were the best and worst single trading days for Salesforce (CRM)?

Largest single-day gain: +26.04%. Largest single-day loss: 27.27%. Tables on this page list the top record green and red days.

What counts as an "extreme" daily move for Salesforce (CRM)?

We treat a day as extreme if the absolute dividend-adjusted daily return exceeds 3%. About 16.8% of trading days for Salesforce (CRM) were extreme (471 up, 449 down).

Data & methodology

How are green, red, and flat days defined?

We use dividend-adjusted (or close-to-close for non-equity) daily returns. Green: return ≥ +0.01%. Red: return ≤ −0.01%. Flat: between those bounds.

How is the current streak calculated?

We count consecutive green or consecutive red days using the same thresholds. If the most recent session is flat, we skip trailing flat days and measure from the last non-flat close.

What does “vs S&P 500” mean?

On sessions where the S&P 500 (^GSPC) was green, we report how often this stock was also green. Shown only for USD equities when benchmark data exists and the symbol is not the index itself.

Where does the archetype come from?

Sample standard deviation of daily returns: low → Steady, high → Explosive, otherwise Balanced. Labels describe typical daily volatility, not quality of the investment.