Starbucks (SBUX) — Daily Price Character

Historical session stats from dividend-adjusted prices: win rate, streaks, record days, weekday patterns, and (when available) how often the stock was green on S&P 500 green days.

Daily streak leaderboard →

Archetype

Balanced

Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

Win rate

48.5%

4126 green · 4012 red · 364 flat · 8502 sessions

Current streak

2 green

As of Apr 7, 2026

Max win / lose streak

11 / 12 days

Win streak return: +10.06% · Lose: 10.89%

Median / σ daily

+0.000% · 2.361%

Avg green +1.75% · avg red 1.59%

Extreme days (>3%)

14.2%

655 up · 554 down

History from Jun 29, 1992 through Apr 7, 2026 · 8502 trading days with returns.

Trailing year — daily returns (calendar)

Apr 8, 2025Apr 7, 2026 · Mon–Fri sessions only

Monday–Friday — average return

Average dividend-adjusted return on that weekday (green / red by sign). Green/red day rule: ±0.01% vs prior close.

Monday–Friday — win rate

Share of sessions that closed green on that weekday. Bars are green at or above 50%, red below 50%.

Top green days

Largest single-session gains (dividend-adjusted), by historical return.

DateReturn
Aug 13, 2024+24.50%
Jul 22, 2009+18.35%
Apr 25, 1996+15.25%
Mar 24, 2020+14.73%
Jan 24, 2003+14.52%
Sep 28, 1998+14.46%
Apr 27, 1999+13.84%
May 30, 2000+13.33%
Oct 28, 2008+13.20%
Mar 13, 2020+12.59%
Oct 5, 2001+12.50%
Mar 31, 2000+12.47%
Jul 24, 2002+11.71%
Jul 26, 1996+11.71%
Mar 3, 2000+11.65%
Jan 26, 2000+11.62%
Apr 9, 2025+11.28%
Oct 30, 2008+11.16%
Mar 26, 2009+11.11%
Sep 28, 1999+11.06%

Worst red days

Largest single-session losses; "Days to recovery" counts trading sessions until close recovered the prior peak (dividend-adjusted).

DateReturnDays to recovery
Jul 1, 199928.37%179
Apr 28, 200018.37%26
Mar 16, 202016.20%17
May 1, 202415.88%71
Jul 24, 199813.62%111
Jul 31, 199811.82%68
Apr 14, 200011.65%5
Apr 3, 202511.22%202
Dec 1, 200811.14%4
Jan 3, 199610.66%42
Sep 29, 199510.61%31
Oct 15, 200810.50%10
Apr 24, 200810.42%24
Aug 18, 201110.19%13
Nov 20, 200810.14%2
Jan 25, 19969.71%5
Jul 27, 20129.38%90
Jul 28, 20179.26%90
May 3, 20239.17%440
Mar 12, 20209.08%1

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily win rate for Starbucks (SBUX)?

Historically, Starbucks (SBUX) closed green on 48.5% of trading days (4126 green, 4012 red, 364 flat), using dividend-adjusted closes and a ±0.01% threshold for green vs red.

What is the current winning or losing streak for Starbucks (SBUX)?

As of 2026-04-07, Starbucks (SBUX) is on a 2-day winning streak (consecutive green or red days by the same rules, ignoring trailing flat days).

What does Steady, Balanced, or Explosive mean for Starbucks (SBUX)?

We label Starbucks (SBUX) as "balanced" based on the sample standard deviation of daily returns: Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

What were the best and worst single trading days for Starbucks (SBUX)?

Largest single-day gain: +24.50%. Largest single-day loss: 28.37%. Tables on this page list the top record green and red days.

What counts as an "extreme" daily move for Starbucks (SBUX)?

We treat a day as extreme if the absolute dividend-adjusted daily return exceeds 3%. About 14.2% of trading days for Starbucks (SBUX) were extreme (655 up, 554 down).

Data & methodology

How are green, red, and flat days defined?

We use dividend-adjusted (or close-to-close for non-equity) daily returns. Green: return ≥ +0.01%. Red: return ≤ −0.01%. Flat: between those bounds.

How is the current streak calculated?

We count consecutive green or consecutive red days using the same thresholds. If the most recent session is flat, we skip trailing flat days and measure from the last non-flat close.

What does “vs S&P 500” mean?

On sessions where the S&P 500 (^GSPC) was green, we report how often this stock was also green. Shown only for USD equities when benchmark data exists and the symbol is not the index itself.

Where does the archetype come from?

Sample standard deviation of daily returns: low → Steady, high → Explosive, otherwise Balanced. Labels describe typical daily volatility, not quality of the investment.