Current
13.7×
5-Year Average
12.1×
All-Time High
238.7×
All-Time Low
2.1×
EV/EBITDA daily chart for Arbor Realty Trust (ABR)
Jun 8, 2021 – Jun 5, 2026 · 1,255 trading days
Historical EV/EBITDA for Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) from 2004 to 2025
| 2025 | $1.52B | $919.42M | 13.1× | +2.8× | |
| 2024 | $2.62B | $1.18B | 10.3× | +2.2× | |
| 2023 | $2.86B | $1.40B | 8.1× | -7.2× | |
| 2022 | $2.30B | $997.53M | 15.4× | -7.3× | |
| 2021 | $2.71B | $638.37M | 22.6× | +7.9× | |
| 2020 | $1.71B | $410.09M | 14.8× | +0.6× | |
| 2019 | $1.46B | $412.86M | 14.2× | +3.5× | |
| 2018 | $788.22M | $367.18M | 10.7× | -0.9× | |
| 2017 | $542.34M | $255.53M | 11.6× | -5.4× | |
| 2016 | $383.45M | $132.45M | 17.0× | -7.1× | |
| 2015 | $364.38M | $55.79M | 24.1× | -45.2× | |
| 2014 | $341.73M | $22.33M | 69.4× | +47.2× | |
| 2013 | $335.07M | $61.18M | 22.2× | -0.7× | |
| 2012 | $184.91M | $57.55M | 22.9× | -47.6× | |
| 2011 | $85.11M | $20.83M | 70.5× | +68.4× | |
| 2010 | $148.77M | $151.95M | 2.1× | — | |
| 2009 | $50.52M | −$6.58M | — | — | |
| 2008 | $74.17M | $108.94M | 19.0× | +8.8× | |
| 2007 | $331.41M | $229.98M | 10.1× | -10.8× | |
| 2006 | $517.05M | $92.47M | 20.9× | -1.6× | |
| 2005 | $442.89M | $45.58M | 22.5× | -9.9× | |
| 2004 | $408.23M | $17.82M | 32.3× | — |
- 202513.1×
- 202410.3×
- 20238.1×
- 202215.4×
- 202122.6×
- 202014.8×
- 201914.2×
- 201810.7×
- 201711.6×
- 201617.0×
- 201524.1×
- 201469.4×
- 201322.2×
- 201222.9×
- 201170.5×
- 20102.1×
- 2009—
- 200819.0×
- 200710.1×
- 200620.9×
- 200522.5×
- 200432.3×
About EV/EBITDA at Arbor Realty Trust (ABR)
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) EV/EBITDA ratio is 13.7× as of June 5, 2026. The 5-year average is 12.1×. The sector median currently stands at 15.8×. The current ratio is at the 63th percentile of its own 10-year history.
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) historical EV/EBITDA ratio has ranged from a low of 2.1× (2010) to a high of 238.7× (2011) in the available daily series.
The EV/EBITDA ratio (the enterprise multiple) compares enterprise value (EV) to trailing twelve-month (TTM) EBITDA. EV is calculated as market capitalisation + total debt − cash & short-term investments. Because EV/EBITDA is capital-structure-neutral and ignores non-cash depreciation and amortisation, it is the standard multiple used in M&A and for cross-company or cross-border comparisons. Note: this calculation uses a simplified EV (minority interest and preferred equity excluded due to data availability), consistent with most public financial-data providers.
Arbor Realty Trust EV/EBITDA by Year
Arbor Realty Trust EV/EBITDA 2025: 13.1×
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2025 was 13.1×, expanded from 10.3× the prior year.
Arbor Realty Trust EV/EBITDA 2024: 10.3×
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2024 was 10.3×, expanded from 8.1× the prior year.
Arbor Realty Trust EV/EBITDA 2023: 8.1×
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2023 was 8.1×, contracted from 15.4× the prior year.
Arbor Realty Trust EV/EBITDA 2022: 15.4×
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2022 was 15.4×, contracted from 22.6× the prior year.
Arbor Realty Trust EV/EBITDA 2021: 22.6×
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2021 was 22.6×.
EV is calculated as Market Cap + Total Debt − Cash & Short-Term Investments (simplified). Minority interest and preferred equity are excluded due to data availability. This is consistent with the methodology used by most public financial data providers.
Sector peers by EV/EBITDA — chart
Current ratio vs. sector peers. Highlighted bar is this company.
Sector peers by EV/EBITDA — table
Real Estate peers of Arbor Realty Trust (ABR), ranked by EV/EBITDA ratio.
| 17.7× | |
| 17.7× | |
| 17.2× | |
| 16.1× | |
| 16.1× | |
| 16.0× | |
| 15.9× | |
| 15.7× | |
| 15.5× | |
| 15.1× | |
| 15.0× | |
| 14.8× | |
| 14.7× | |
| 14.7× | |
| 13.1× | |
| 13.0× | |
| 12.8× | |
| 12.8× | |
| 12.6× | |
| 12.4× | |
| 11.7× | |
| 11.6× | |
| 11.5× | |
| 8.8× | |
| 8.1× |
- 17.7×
- 17.2×
- 15.7×
- 15.1×
- 15.0×
- 14.7×
- 12.6×
Frequently asked questions
Arbor Realty Trust (ABR) Key Financials
Charts, filings, and peer comparison for every metric