Current
—
5-Year Average
—
All-Time High
3385.9×
All-Time Low
69.1×
P/FCF Ratio daily chart for California Water Service Group (CWT)
Jun 8, 2021 – Jun 5, 2026 · 1,255 trading days
P/FCF ratio is not shown for periods when TTM free cash flow was negative.
Historical P/FCF Ratio for California Water Service Group (CWT) from 2001 to 2025
| 2025 | $2.58B | −$214.43M | — | — | |
| 2024 | $2.66B | −$179.93M | — | — | |
| 2023 | $2.99B | −$165.93M | — | — | |
| 2022 | $3.34B | −$83.98M | — | — | |
| 2021 | $3.82B | −$61.48M | — | — | |
| 2020 | $2.70B | −$180.73M | — | — | |
| 2019 | $2.49B | −$104.98M | — | — | |
| 2018 | $2.29B | −$92.69M | — | — | |
| 2017 | $2.18B | −$111.35M | — | — | |
| 2016 | $1.63B | −$69.24M | — | — | |
| 2015 | $1.11B | −$32.20M | — | — | |
| 2014 | $1.18B | −$3.88M | — | — | |
| 2013 | $1.10B | $1.19M | 929.4× | +747.8× | |
| 2012 | $769.01M | $4.23M | 181.7× | — | |
| 2011 | $763.61M | −$7.27M | — | — | |
| 2010 | $776.60M | −$48.42M | — | — | |
| 2009 | $764.38M | −$38.18M | — | — | |
| 2008 | $961.78M | −$12.07M | — | — | |
| 2007 | $765.13M | −$51.29M | — | — | |
| 2006 | $824.36M | −$53.45M | — | — | |
| 2005 | $702.79M | −$8.26M | — | — | |
| 2004 | $691.48M | −$13.16M | — | — | |
| 2003 | $463.94M | −$29.82M | — | — | |
| 2002 | $358.90M | −$54.95M | — | — | |
| 2001 | $391.09M | −$23.46M | — | — |
- 2025—
- 2024—
- 2023—
- 2022—
- 2021—
- 2020—
- 2019—
- 2018—
- 2017—
- 2016—
- 2015—
- 2014—
- 2013929.4×
- 2012181.7×
- 2011—
- 2010—
- 2009—
- 2008—
- 2007—
- 2006—
- 2005—
- 2004—
- 2003—
- 2002—
- 2001—
About P/FCF Ratio at California Water Service Group (CWT)
California Water Service Group (CWT) historical P/FCF ratio has ranged from a low of 69.1× (2014) to a high of 3385.9× (2005) in the available daily series.
The price-to-free-cash-flow (P/FCF) ratio compares a company's market capitalisation to its trailing twelve-month (TTM) free cash flow. It is calculated as market cap ÷ TTM free cash flow, where free cash flow = operating cash flow − capital expenditures. Because FCF cannot be inflated by non-cash accounting items, P/FCF is often considered a cleaner measure of "earnings-power valuation" than P/E — especially for capital-intensive businesses where depreciation diverges from real cash outflows.
California Water Service Group P/FCF Ratio by Year
California Water Service Group P/FCF Ratio 2013: 929.4×
California Water Service Group (CWT) P/FCF ratio in 2013 was 929.4×, expanded from 181.7× the prior year.
California Water Service Group P/FCF Ratio 2012: 181.7×
California Water Service Group (CWT) P/FCF ratio in 2012 was 181.7×.
Sector peers by P/FCF Ratio — chart
Current ratio vs. sector peers. Highlighted bar is this company.
Sector peers by P/FCF Ratio — table
Utilities peers of California Water Service Group (CWT), ranked by P/FCF ratio.
| 110.1× | |
| 86.9× | |
| 82.1× | |
| 77.8× | |
| 63.1× | |
| 52.9× | |
| 32.9× | |
| 31.2× | |
| 16.3× | |
| 15.4× | |
| 14.6× | |
| 11.5× | |
| 7.9× |
- 110.1×
- 82.1×
- 52.9×
- 32.9×
- 31.2×
- 16.3×
- 15.4×
- 7.9×
Frequently asked questions
California Water Service Group (CWT) Key Financials
Charts, filings, and peer comparison for every metric