Corning (GLW) — Daily Price Character

Historical session stats from dividend-adjusted prices: win rate, streaks, record days, weekday patterns, and (when available) how often the stock was green on S&P 500 green days.

Daily streak leaderboard →

Archetype

Balanced

Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

Win rate

47.4%

5292 green · 5087 red · 775 flat · 11154 sessions

Current streak

1 green

As of Apr 7, 2026

Max win / lose streak

12 / 11 days

Win streak return: +11.45% · Lose: 35.18%

Median / σ daily

+0.000% · 2.576%

Avg green +1.82% · avg red 1.72%

Extreme days (>3%)

13.9%

842 up · 706 down

History from Jan 4, 1982 through Apr 7, 2026 · 11154 trading days with returns.

Trailing year — daily returns (calendar)

Apr 8, 2025Apr 7, 2026 · Mon–Fri sessions only

Monday–Friday — average return

Average dividend-adjusted return on that weekday (green / red by sign). Green/red day rule: ±0.01% vs prior close.

Monday–Friday — win rate

Share of sessions that closed green on that weekday. Bars are green at or above 50%, red below 50%.

Top green days

Largest single-session gains (dividend-adjusted), by historical return.

DateReturn
Nov 6, 2002+21.71%
Apr 25, 2000+20.55%
Nov 12, 2002+19.72%
Apr 23, 2004+18.40%
Oct 11, 2001+18.35%
Feb 10, 2003+17.94%
Jan 3, 2001+17.00%
Oct 24, 2002+16.81%
Feb 8, 2002+16.75%
Jan 20, 2000+16.52%
Oct 20, 1998+16.37%
Jan 27, 2026+15.59%
Nov 14, 2002+15.03%
Oct 15, 2002+14.26%
Oct 13, 2008+14.23%
Oct 23, 2013+14.22%
Mar 11, 2002+13.57%
Nov 13, 2002+13.53%
Jan 2, 2003+13.30%
Aug 26, 2002+13.18%

Worst red days

Largest single-session losses; "Days to recovery" counts trading sessions until close recovered the prior peak (dividend-adjusted).

DateReturnDays to recovery
Jul 31, 200235.58%69
Oct 19, 198730.70%179
Feb 16, 200121.43%4252
Jul 30, 200221.26%76
Jan 25, 200119.79%5972
Oct 7, 199318.50%119
Oct 25, 200017.78%6224
Aug 30, 200117.48%923
Oct 8, 200217.29%2
Mar 16, 202016.39%50
Aug 28, 200215.23%48
Jul 26, 200614.47%22
Jun 26, 200214.46%7
Oct 4, 200114.36%6
Mar 28, 200114.04%15
Oct 3, 200213.97%8
Apr 23, 200113.49%1221
Jan 13, 199213.39%211
Mar 12, 200113.27%1258
Sep 3, 200812.50%329

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily win rate for Corning (GLW)?

Historically, Corning (GLW) closed green on 47.4% of trading days (5292 green, 5087 red, 775 flat), using dividend-adjusted closes and a ±0.01% threshold for green vs red.

What is the current winning or losing streak for Corning (GLW)?

As of 2026-04-07, Corning (GLW) is on a 1-day winning streak (consecutive green or red days by the same rules, ignoring trailing flat days).

What does Steady, Balanced, or Explosive mean for Corning (GLW)?

We label Corning (GLW) as "balanced" based on the sample standard deviation of daily returns: Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

What were the best and worst single trading days for Corning (GLW)?

Largest single-day gain: +21.71%. Largest single-day loss: 35.58%. Tables on this page list the top record green and red days.

What counts as an "extreme" daily move for Corning (GLW)?

We treat a day as extreme if the absolute dividend-adjusted daily return exceeds 3%. About 13.9% of trading days for Corning (GLW) were extreme (842 up, 706 down).

Data & methodology

How are green, red, and flat days defined?

We use dividend-adjusted (or close-to-close for non-equity) daily returns. Green: return ≥ +0.01%. Red: return ≤ −0.01%. Flat: between those bounds.

How is the current streak calculated?

We count consecutive green or consecutive red days using the same thresholds. If the most recent session is flat, we skip trailing flat days and measure from the last non-flat close.

What does “vs S&P 500” mean?

On sessions where the S&P 500 (^GSPC) was green, we report how often this stock was also green. Shown only for USD equities when benchmark data exists and the symbol is not the index itself.

Where does the archetype come from?

Sample standard deviation of daily returns: low → Steady, high → Explosive, otherwise Balanced. Labels describe typical daily volatility, not quality of the investment.