Current
47.6×
5-Year Average
18.6×
All-Time High
432.6×
All-Time Low
4.5×
EV/EBITDA daily chart for Lam Research (LRCX)
Jun 8, 2021 – Jun 5, 2026 · 1,255 trading days
Historical EV/EBITDA for Lam Research (LRCX) from 2002 to 2025
| 2025 | $124.04B | $6.48B | 18.8× | -9.4× | |
| 2024 | $139.37B | $4.91B | 28.2× | +13.0× | |
| 2023 | $86.18B | $5.64B | 15.2× | +4.7× | |
| 2022 | $58.81B | $5.71B | 10.5× | -8.3× | |
| 2021 | $92.83B | $4.89B | 18.8× | +3.6× | |
| 2020 | $47.00B | $3.02B | 15.3× | +5.7× | |
| 2019 | $28.34B | $2.87B | 9.5× | +2.5× | |
| 2018 | $27.82B | $3.58B | 7.1× | -1.7× | |
| 2017 | $22.94B | $2.24B | 8.8× | +1.0× | |
| 2016 | $13.44B | $1.42B | 7.7× | -2.0× | |
| 2015 | $12.91B | $1.16B | 9.7× | +0.1× | |
| 2014 | $10.97B | $965.93M | 9.6× | -4.3× | |
| 2013 | $7.18B | $431.18M | 13.9× | +3.8× | |
| 2012 | $5.05B | $344.20M | 10.1× | +5.4× | |
| 2011 | $5.48B | $881.01M | 4.7× | -3.3× | |
| 2010 | $4.81B | $502.54M | 8.0× | — | |
| 2009 | $3.28B | −$184.18M | — | — | |
| 2008 | $4.51B | $548.46M | 6.9× | -1.2× | |
| 2007 | $6.70B | $774.58M | 8.1× | -6.2× | |
| 2006 | $6.59B | $412.46M | 14.3× | +6.7× | |
| 2005 | $4.00B | $419.76M | 7.6× | -14.6× | |
| 2004 | $3.75B | $149.88M | 22.2× | -16.6× | |
| 2003 | $2.32B | $55.48M | 38.8× | — | |
| 2002 | $2.14B | −$10.65M | — | — |
- 202518.8×
- 202428.2×
- 202315.2×
- 202210.5×
- 202118.8×
- 202015.3×
- 20199.5×
- 20187.1×
- 20178.8×
- 20167.7×
- 20159.7×
- 20149.6×
- 201313.9×
- 201210.1×
- 20114.7×
- 20108.0×
- 2009—
- 20086.9×
- 20078.1×
- 200614.3×
- 20057.6×
- 200422.2×
- 200338.8×
- 2002—
About EV/EBITDA at Lam Research (LRCX)
Lam Research (LRCX) EV/EBITDA ratio is 47.6× as of June 5, 2026. The 5-year average is 18.6×. The sector median currently stands at 19.5×. The current ratio is at the 99th percentile of its own 10-year history.
Lam Research (LRCX) historical EV/EBITDA ratio has ranged from a low of 4.5× (2011) to a high of 432.6× (2002) in the available daily series.
The EV/EBITDA ratio (the enterprise multiple) compares enterprise value (EV) to trailing twelve-month (TTM) EBITDA. EV is calculated as market capitalisation + total debt − cash & short-term investments. Because EV/EBITDA is capital-structure-neutral and ignores non-cash depreciation and amortisation, it is the standard multiple used in M&A and for cross-company or cross-border comparisons. Note: this calculation uses a simplified EV (minority interest and preferred equity excluded due to data availability), consistent with most public financial-data providers.
Lam Research EV/EBITDA by Year
Lam Research EV/EBITDA 2025: 18.8×
Lam Research (LRCX) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2025 was 18.8×, contracted from 28.2× the prior year.
Lam Research EV/EBITDA 2024: 28.2×
Lam Research (LRCX) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2024 was 28.2×, expanded from 15.2× the prior year.
Lam Research EV/EBITDA 2023: 15.2×
Lam Research (LRCX) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2023 was 15.2×, expanded from 10.5× the prior year.
Lam Research EV/EBITDA 2022: 10.5×
Lam Research (LRCX) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2022 was 10.5×, contracted from 18.8× the prior year.
Lam Research EV/EBITDA 2021: 18.8×
Lam Research (LRCX) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2021 was 18.8×.
EV is calculated as Market Cap + Total Debt − Cash & Short-Term Investments (simplified). Minority interest and preferred equity are excluded due to data availability. This is consistent with the methodology used by most public financial data providers.
Sector peers by EV/EBITDA — chart
Current ratio vs. sector peers. Highlighted bar is this company.
Sector peers by EV/EBITDA — table
Technology peers of Lam Research (LRCX), ranked by EV/EBITDA ratio.
| 12.6× | |
| 12.5× | |
| 12.3× | |
| 11.9× | |
| 11.3× | |
| 11.1× | |
| 10.9× | |
| 10.8× | |
| 10.8× | |
| 10.6× | |
| 10.5× | |
| 10.5× | |
| 10.3× | |
| 10.2× | |
| 10.0× | |
| 9.6× | |
| 9.4× | |
| 9.2× | |
| 8.5× | |
| 8.2× | |
| 7.4× | |
| 7.2× | |
| 7.0× | |
| 6.9× | |
| 6.4× |
- 11.9×
- 11.3×
- 10.9×
- 10.8×
- 10.6×
- 10.5×
- 10.5×
- 10.2×
- 10.0×
- 8.5×
- 7.2×
- 6.9×
- 6.4×
Frequently asked questions
Lam Research (LRCX) Key Financials
Charts, filings, and peer comparison for every metric