Current
15.3×
5-Year Average
21.6×
All-Time High
28.3×
All-Time Low
5.3×
EV/EBITDA daily chart for Microsoft (MSFT)
Jun 8, 2021 – Jun 5, 2026 · 1,255 trading days
Historical EV/EBITDA for Microsoft (MSFT) from 2002 to 2025
| 2025 | $3.70T | $160.16B | 23.2× | -2.5× | |
| 2024 | $3.39T | $133.01B | 25.7× | +1.9× | |
| 2023 | $2.53T | $105.14B | 23.8× | +4.9× | |
| 2022 | $1.92T | $100.24B | 18.9× | -4.5× | |
| 2021 | $2.04T | $85.13B | 23.4× | +1.6× | |
| 2020 | $1.54T | $68.42B | 21.7× | +4.7× | |
| 2019 | $1.04T | $58.06B | 17.1× | +2.7× | |
| 2018 | $757.62B | $49.47B | 14.4× | +2.2× | |
| 2017 | $533.93B | $40.90B | 12.1× | -0.2× | |
| 2016 | $401.28B | $27.62B | 12.4× | +0.7× | |
| 2015 | $355.89B | $25.25B | 11.7× | +3.3× | |
| 2014 | $343.86B | $33.63B | 8.3× | +1.1× | |
| 2013 | $286.73B | $31.24B | 7.2× | -0.6× | |
| 2012 | $256.59B | $26.23B | 7.8× | +2.0× | |
| 2011 | $219.10B | $30.73B | 5.8× | -0.1× | |
| 2010 | $200.51B | $28.77B | 5.9× | -2.2× | |
| 2009 | $211.55B | $22.93B | 8.1× | -1.3× | |
| 2008 | $254.88B | $24.55B | 9.4× | -3.4× | |
| 2007 | $280.11B | $19.96B | 12.9× | +1.2× | |
| 2006 | $237.40B | $17.38B | 11.7× | -3.2× | |
| 2005 | $267.01B | $15.42B | 14.9× | -9.4× | |
| 2004 | $309.13B | $10.22B | 24.3× | +4.9× | |
| 2003 | $275.17B | $11.64B | 19.4× | +0.5× | |
| 2002 | $285.13B | $12.99B | 19.0× | — |
- 202523.2×
- 202425.7×
- 202323.8×
- 202218.9×
- 202123.4×
- 202021.7×
- 201917.1×
- 201814.4×
- 201712.1×
- 201612.4×
- 201511.7×
- 20148.3×
- 20137.2×
- 20127.8×
- 20115.8×
- 20105.9×
- 20098.1×
- 20089.4×
- 200712.9×
- 200611.7×
- 200514.9×
- 200424.3×
- 200319.4×
- 200219.0×
About EV/EBITDA at Microsoft (MSFT)
Microsoft (MSFT) EV/EBITDA ratio is 15.3× as of June 5, 2026. The 5-year average is 21.6×. The sector median currently stands at 19.5×. The current ratio is at the 2th percentile of its own 10-year history.
Microsoft (MSFT) historical EV/EBITDA ratio has ranged from a low of 5.3× (2011) to a high of 28.3× (2021) in the available daily series.
The EV/EBITDA ratio (the enterprise multiple) compares enterprise value (EV) to trailing twelve-month (TTM) EBITDA. EV is calculated as market capitalisation + total debt − cash & short-term investments. Because EV/EBITDA is capital-structure-neutral and ignores non-cash depreciation and amortisation, it is the standard multiple used in M&A and for cross-company or cross-border comparisons. Note: this calculation uses a simplified EV (minority interest and preferred equity excluded due to data availability), consistent with most public financial-data providers.
Microsoft EV/EBITDA by Year
Microsoft EV/EBITDA 2025: 23.2×
Microsoft (MSFT) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2025 was 23.2×, contracted from 25.7× the prior year.
Microsoft EV/EBITDA 2024: 25.7×
Microsoft (MSFT) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2024 was 25.7×, expanded from 23.8× the prior year.
Microsoft EV/EBITDA 2023: 23.8×
Microsoft (MSFT) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2023 was 23.8×, expanded from 18.9× the prior year.
Microsoft EV/EBITDA 2022: 18.9×
Microsoft (MSFT) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2022 was 18.9×, contracted from 23.4× the prior year.
Microsoft EV/EBITDA 2021: 23.4×
Microsoft (MSFT) EV/EBITDA ratio in 2021 was 23.4×.
EV is calculated as Market Cap + Total Debt − Cash & Short-Term Investments (simplified). Minority interest and preferred equity are excluded due to data availability. This is consistent with the methodology used by most public financial data providers.
Sector peers by EV/EBITDA — chart
Current ratio vs. sector peers. Highlighted bar is this company.
Sector peers by EV/EBITDA — table
Technology peers of Microsoft (MSFT), ranked by EV/EBITDA ratio.
| 12.6× | |
| 12.5× | |
| 12.3× | |
| 11.9× | |
| 11.3× | |
| 11.1× | |
| 10.9× | |
| 10.8× | |
| 10.8× | |
| 10.6× | |
| 10.5× | |
| 10.5× | |
| 10.3× | |
| 10.2× | |
| 10.0× | |
| 9.6× | |
| 9.4× | |
| 9.2× | |
| 8.5× | |
| 8.2× | |
| 7.4× | |
| 7.2× | |
| 7.0× | |
| 6.9× | |
| 6.4× |
- 11.9×
- 11.3×
- 10.9×
- 10.8×
- 10.6×
- 10.5×
- 10.5×
- 10.2×
- 10.0×
- 8.5×
- 7.2×
- 6.9×
- 6.4×
Frequently asked questions
Microsoft (MSFT) Key Financials
Charts, filings, and peer comparison for every metric