Synopsys (SNPS) — Daily Price Character

Historical session stats from dividend-adjusted prices: win rate, streaks, record days, weekday patterns, and (when available) how often the stock was green on S&P 500 green days.

Daily streak leaderboard →

Archetype

Balanced

Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

Win rate

50.8%

4364 green · 4040 red · 183 flat · 8587 sessions

Current streak

2 green

As of Apr 7, 2026

Max win / lose streak

11 / 9 days

Win streak return: +13.61% · Lose: 13.42%

Median / σ daily

+0.052% · 2.540%

Avg green +1.73% · avg red 1.70%

Extreme days (>3%)

16.1%

727 up · 654 down

History from Feb 27, 1992 through Apr 7, 2026 · 8587 trading days with returns.

Trailing year — daily returns (calendar)

Apr 8, 2025Apr 7, 2026 · Mon–Fri sessions only

Monday–Friday — average return

Average dividend-adjusted return on that weekday (green / red by sign). Green/red day rule: ±0.01% vs prior close.

Monday–Friday — win rate

Share of sessions that closed green on that weekday. Bars are green at or above 50%, red below 50%.

Top green days

Largest single-session gains (dividend-adjusted), by historical return.

DateReturn
Apr 18, 1997+19.43%
Nov 5, 2002+15.91%
May 22, 2003+15.76%
Apr 18, 2001+15.68%
Apr 28, 1998+15.10%
Sep 1, 1998+14.62%
Jan 3, 2001+13.76%
Sep 11, 2025+12.98%
Sep 18, 2025+12.86%
Apr 30, 1997+12.81%
Mar 16, 2000+12.63%
Apr 9, 2025+12.35%
Sep 8, 1998+12.33%
Sep 17, 1997+12.17%
Oct 9, 1998+12.12%
Nov 30, 2000+11.81%
May 20, 2004+11.65%
Apr 30, 1992+11.54%
Dec 4, 2008+11.53%
Oct 13, 2008+11.45%

Worst red days

Largest single-session losses; "Days to recovery" counts trading sessions until close recovered the prior peak (dividend-adjusted).

DateReturnDays to recovery
Sep 10, 202535.84%
Aug 19, 200431.16%352
Feb 18, 200019.23%18
Jun 27, 200018.16%111
Aug 2, 200416.63%589
Feb 14, 200016.06%76
Jul 18, 199713.43%42
Apr 5, 199913.40%46
Feb 24, 200413.22%2258
Mar 16, 202013.19%15
Dec 5, 202412.37%151
Apr 20, 199412.28%6
Mar 26, 199711.99%24
Oct 9, 199511.96%2
Apr 10, 199711.92%6
Aug 20, 199811.87%18
Jan 20, 199911.86%119
Aug 21, 200811.68%518
Feb 20, 199711.18%96
Jan 17, 199611.00%3

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily win rate for Synopsys (SNPS)?

Historically, Synopsys (SNPS) closed green on 50.8% of trading days (4364 green, 4040 red, 183 flat), using dividend-adjusted closes and a ±0.01% threshold for green vs red.

What is the current winning or losing streak for Synopsys (SNPS)?

As of 2026-04-07, Synopsys (SNPS) is on a 2-day winning streak (consecutive green or red days by the same rules, ignoring trailing flat days).

What does Steady, Balanced, or Explosive mean for Synopsys (SNPS)?

We label Synopsys (SNPS) as "balanced" based on the sample standard deviation of daily returns: Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

What were the best and worst single trading days for Synopsys (SNPS)?

Largest single-day gain: +19.43%. Largest single-day loss: 35.84%. Tables on this page list the top record green and red days.

What counts as an "extreme" daily move for Synopsys (SNPS)?

We treat a day as extreme if the absolute dividend-adjusted daily return exceeds 3%. About 16.1% of trading days for Synopsys (SNPS) were extreme (727 up, 654 down).

Data & methodology

How are green, red, and flat days defined?

We use dividend-adjusted (or close-to-close for non-equity) daily returns. Green: return ≥ +0.01%. Red: return ≤ −0.01%. Flat: between those bounds.

How is the current streak calculated?

We count consecutive green or consecutive red days using the same thresholds. If the most recent session is flat, we skip trailing flat days and measure from the last non-flat close.

What does “vs S&P 500” mean?

On sessions where the S&P 500 (^GSPC) was green, we report how often this stock was also green. Shown only for USD equities when benchmark data exists and the symbol is not the index itself.

Where does the archetype come from?

Sample standard deviation of daily returns: low → Steady, high → Explosive, otherwise Balanced. Labels describe typical daily volatility, not quality of the investment.