Trimble (TRMB) — Daily Price Character

Historical session stats from dividend-adjusted prices: win rate, streaks, record days, weekday patterns, and (when available) how often the stock was green on S&P 500 green days.

Daily streak leaderboard →

Archetype

Explosive

High daily volatility — frequent large price swings.

Win rate

47.5%

4273 green · 4287 red · 432 flat · 8992 sessions

Current streak

2 red

As of Apr 7, 2026

Max win / lose streak

10 / 10 days

Win streak return: +10.01% · Lose: 8.65%

Median / σ daily

+0.000% · 3.137%

Avg green +2.26% · avg red 2.06%

Extreme days (>3%)

21.3%

993 up · 926 down

History from Jul 23, 1990 through Apr 7, 2026 · 8992 trading days with returns.

Trailing year — daily returns (calendar)

Apr 8, 2025Apr 7, 2026 · Mon–Fri sessions only

Monday–Friday — average return

Average dividend-adjusted return on that weekday (green / red by sign). Green/red day rule: ±0.01% vs prior close.

Monday–Friday — win rate

Share of sessions that closed green on that weekday. Bars are green at or above 50%, red below 50%.

Top green days

Largest single-session gains (dividend-adjusted), by historical return.

DateReturn
Oct 29, 2003+29.78%
Apr 20, 2000+29.23%
Oct 11, 2001+27.19%
Oct 7, 1999+26.97%
Jan 24, 2008+25.06%
Mar 28, 1996+24.35%
Apr 25, 2008+24.02%
Jan 6, 1993+22.00%
Oct 30, 2015+21.40%
Apr 13, 1992+20.25%
Jul 27, 2004+19.46%
Oct 4, 1990+19.44%
Jan 25, 2006+19.18%
Mar 19, 2020+18.81%
Aug 24, 2000+17.93%
Nov 6, 2024+17.88%
Aug 3, 2011+17.59%
Oct 24, 2002+17.37%
Nov 1, 2013+17.10%
Sep 17, 1990+17.00%

Worst red days

Largest single-session losses; "Days to recovery" counts trading sessions until close recovered the prior peak (dividend-adjusted).

DateReturnDays to recovery
Sep 19, 200026.94%787
Apr 6, 200126.12%17
Jan 15, 200920.85%69
Mar 12, 202018.60%19
Jul 19, 200017.77%1255
Jan 30, 200117.68%649
Dec 1, 200817.29%11
Jun 14, 199616.19%375
Aug 5, 201516.06%62
Dec 19, 199115.75%16
Dec 29, 199915.47%3
Jan 21, 199915.19%45
Mar 16, 202014.57%6
Apr 4, 200014.32%2
Nov 10, 200013.93%20
Dec 5, 199513.87%54
Jul 27, 200513.85%162
Sep 6, 199613.49%190
Nov 1, 202313.09%21
Mar 5, 199312.66%43

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily win rate for Trimble (TRMB)?

Historically, Trimble (TRMB) closed green on 47.5% of trading days (4273 green, 4287 red, 432 flat), using dividend-adjusted closes and a ±0.01% threshold for green vs red.

What is the current winning or losing streak for Trimble (TRMB)?

As of 2026-04-07, Trimble (TRMB) is on a 2-day losing streak (consecutive green or red days by the same rules, ignoring trailing flat days).

What does Steady, Balanced, or Explosive mean for Trimble (TRMB)?

We label Trimble (TRMB) as "explosive" based on the sample standard deviation of daily returns: High daily volatility — frequent large price swings.

What were the best and worst single trading days for Trimble (TRMB)?

Largest single-day gain: +29.78%. Largest single-day loss: 26.94%. Tables on this page list the top record green and red days.

What counts as an "extreme" daily move for Trimble (TRMB)?

We treat a day as extreme if the absolute dividend-adjusted daily return exceeds 3%. About 21.3% of trading days for Trimble (TRMB) were extreme (993 up, 926 down).

Data & methodology

How are green, red, and flat days defined?

We use dividend-adjusted (or close-to-close for non-equity) daily returns. Green: return ≥ +0.01%. Red: return ≤ −0.01%. Flat: between those bounds.

How is the current streak calculated?

We count consecutive green or consecutive red days using the same thresholds. If the most recent session is flat, we skip trailing flat days and measure from the last non-flat close.

What does “vs S&P 500” mean?

On sessions where the S&P 500 (^GSPC) was green, we report how often this stock was also green. Shown only for USD equities when benchmark data exists and the symbol is not the index itself.

Where does the archetype come from?

Sample standard deviation of daily returns: low → Steady, high → Explosive, otherwise Balanced. Labels describe typical daily volatility, not quality of the investment.