Buyback yield (TTM)
N/A
Shareholder yield (TTM)
0.04%
5Y share count change
5.3%
Buyback spend (TTM)
N/A
Cumulative buybacks
$4.25B
Key takeaways
- Diluted share count is up 5.3% over the last ~5 fiscal years — equity issuance and stock-based compensation are outpacing repurchases.
- TTM repurchases used about 0% of free cash flow remaining after dividends.
Dividend & buyback yield over time for Duke Energy (DUK)
Stacked annual yields — buyback yield (TTM cash repurchases ÷ market cap) plus dividend yield from the same fiscal-year-end key-metrics period — show how total cash return per dollar of equity has evolved.
Diluted vs basic shares (annual) for Duke Energy (DUK)
Diluted weighted-average shares are the EPS denominator — a falling count means buybacks are outpacing SBC dilution.
Year-over-year change in diluted shares for Duke Energy (DUK)
Green is fewer shares vs the prior fiscal year (net repurchase); red is growth (dilution). The earliest year shown has no prior year to compare.
Cash buyback spend over time for Duke Energy (DUK)
Latest: $0.00
Overview
In 2025, Duke Energy (DUK) buyback spend totalled $0.00.
Through 2015–2025 (10 years), Duke Energy buyback spend delivered a -100.0% annualised rate; with a net decline across the window.
Duke Energy buyback spend plunged from $1.50B in 2015 to $0.00 in 2025, a 100.0% drawdown.
The record annual buyback spend stands at $1.50B, reached in 2015; the historical low of $0.00 was recorded in 2007.
Duke Energy Buyback Spend 2025: $0.00
Duke Energy buyback spend in 2025 was $0.00.
Duke Energy Buyback Spend 2024: $0.00
Duke Energy buyback spend in 2024 was $0.00.
Duke Energy Buyback Spend 2023: $0.00
Duke Energy buyback spend in 2023 was $0.00.
Duke Energy Buyback Spend 2022: $0.00
Duke Energy buyback spend in 2022 was $0.00.
Duke Energy Buyback Spend 2021: $0.00
Duke Energy buyback spend in 2021 was $0.00.
See more financial history for Duke Energy (DUK).
Buyback, SBC & dilution history
Buyback spend, SBC, net dilution effect, and share count.
| 2025 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.78B | +0.6% | |
| 2024 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.77B | +0.1% | |
| 2023 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.77B | +0.1% | |
| 2022 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.77B | +0.1% | |
| 2021 | $0.00 | $83.00M | −$83.00M | — | 0.77B | +4.2% | |
| 2020 | $0.00 | $79.00M | −$79.00M | — | 0.74B | +1.2% | |
| 2019 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.73B | +3.0% | |
| 2018 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.71B | +1.1% | |
| 2017 | $0.00 | $64.00M | −$64.00M | — | 0.70B | +1.3% | |
| 2016 | $0.00 | $53.00M | −$53.00M | — | 0.69B | -0.4% | |
| 2015 | $1.50B | $0.00 | $1.50B | 3.05% | 0.69B | -1.8% | |
| 2014 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.71B | +0.1% | |
| 2013 | $96.00M | $52.00M | $44.00M | 0.20% | 0.71B | +22.8% | |
| 2012 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.57B | +29.4% | |
| 2011 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.44B | +1.0% | |
| 2010 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.44B | +2.0% | |
| 2009 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.43B | +2.1% | |
| 2008 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.42B | +0.1% | |
| 2007 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | — | 0.42B | +6.6% | |
| 2006 | $512.00M | $0.00 | $512.00M | 2.11% | 0.40B | +22.5% | |
| 2005 | $1.07B | $0.00 | $1.07B | 7.21% | 0.32B | +0.9% | |
| 2004 | $176.00M | $0.00 | $176.00M | 1.27% | 0.32B | +6.4% | |
| 2003 | $38.00M | $0.00 | $38.00M | 0.35% | 0.30B | +8.0% | |
| 2002 | $88.00M | $0.00 | $88.00M | 0.86% | 0.28B | +8.4% | |
| 2001 | $33.00M | $0.00 | $33.00M | 0.19% | 0.26B | +4.6% | |
| 2000 | $33.00M | $0.00 | $33.00M | — | 0.25B | +0.8% | |
| 1999 | $20.00M | $0.00 | $20.00M | — | 0.24B | +1.2% | |
| 1998 | $180.00M | $0.00 | $180.00M | — | 0.24B | +0.4% | |
| 1997 | $249.00M | $0.00 | $249.00M | — | 0.24B | +54.6% | |
| 1996 | $159.00M | $0.00 | $159.00M | — | 0.16B | — | |
| 1995 | $100.50M | $0.00 | $100.50M | — | — | — | |
| 1994 | $1.50M | $0.00 | $1.50M | — | — | — |
- 2025$0.00
- 2024$0.00
- 2023$0.00
- 2022$0.00
- 2021$0.00
- 2020$0.00
- 2019$0.00
- 2018$0.00
- 2017$0.00
- 2016$0.00
- 2015$1.50B
- 2014$0.00
- 2013$96.00M
- 2012$0.00
- 2011$0.00
- 2010$0.00
- 2009$0.00
- 2008$0.00
- 2007$0.00
- 2006$512.00M
- 2005$1.07B
- 2004$176.00M
- 2003$38.00M
- 2002$88.00M
- 2001$33.00M
- 2000$33.00M
- 1999$20.00M
- 1998$180.00M
- 1997$249.00M
- 1996$159.00M
- 1995$100.50M
- 1994$1.50M
Buybacks vs stock-based compensation for Duke Energy (DUK)
Annual cash repurchases set against stock-based compensation. Coverage above 1× means buybacks fully offset the equity dilution from SBC. TTM coverage: N/A.
Buybacks vs dividends (share of cash returned) for Duke Energy (DUK)
How Duke Energy splits cash returned to shareholders between dividends and buybacks.
Sector peers by buyback spend
Companies in the same sector as Duke Energy, ranked by their latest buyback spend.
| $3.32B | |
| $1.03B | |
| $958.00M | |
| $400.00M | |
| $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | |
| $0.00 |
- $3.32B
- $1.03B
- $958.00M
- $400.00M
- $0.00
- $0.00
Buyback capacity (TTM)
Free cash flow minus dividends paid versus actual TTM repurchases — the headroom bar shows how much of post-dividend FCF is still being deployed elsewhere.
Headroom $6.56B (TTM FCF − TTM dividends, clamped at zero).
Frequently asked questions
Data & methodology
Explore more
Deep-dives across the income statement, cash flow, capital return, and valuation