Ralph Lauren (RL) — Daily Price Character

Historical session stats from dividend-adjusted prices: win rate, streaks, record days, weekday patterns, and (when available) how often the stock was green on S&P 500 green days.

Daily streak leaderboard →

Archetype

Balanced

Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

Win rate

49.5%

3589 green · 3578 red · 81 flat · 7248 sessions

Current streak

1 red

As of Apr 7, 2026

Max win / lose streak

12 / 13 days

Win streak return: +23.45% · Lose: 14.45%

Median / σ daily

+0.000% · 2.473%

Avg green +1.79% · avg red 1.66%

Extreme days (>3%)

15.5%

592 up · 529 down

History from Jun 13, 1997 through Apr 7, 2026 · 7248 trading days with returns.

Trailing year — daily returns (calendar)

Apr 8, 2025Apr 7, 2026 · Mon–Fri sessions only

Monday–Friday — average return

Average dividend-adjusted return on that weekday (green / red by sign). Green/red day rule: ±0.01% vs prior close.

Monday–Friday — win rate

Share of sessions that closed green on that weekday. Bars are green at or above 50%, red below 50%.

Top green days

Largest single-session gains (dividend-adjusted), by historical return.

DateReturn
Nov 9, 2020+19.80%
Oct 5, 2000+17.84%
Feb 8, 2024+16.80%
Jul 24, 2006+15.67%
Feb 7, 2000+14.99%
Nov 5, 2015+14.90%
Nov 7, 2019+14.66%
May 23, 2018+14.34%
Apr 9, 2025+14.28%
Nov 2, 1998+14.14%
Sep 30, 2015+13.55%
Nov 24, 2008+13.31%
Aug 8, 2017+13.28%
Nov 6, 2002+12.54%
Apr 6, 2020+12.46%
Oct 3, 2001+12.12%
Oct 28, 2008+12.06%
May 28, 2008+11.74%
May 26, 2020+11.71%
Nov 13, 2008+10.74%

Worst red days

Largest single-session losses; "Days to recovery" counts trading sessions until close recovered the prior peak (dividend-adjusted).

DateReturnDays to recovery
Feb 4, 201622.16%493
Feb 4, 201518.22%2233
Apr 3, 202516.27%21
Nov 5, 199815.67%57
Mar 16, 202014.44%55
Oct 15, 200814.32%122
Feb 2, 201712.31%129
Mar 7, 202212.22%8
Mar 12, 202012.13%60
Aug 8, 200711.84%680
May 25, 201111.36%23
Jun 30, 200010.98%3
May 25, 199910.43%408
Mar 9, 202010.18%210
Nov 2, 20219.73%73
Nov 19, 20089.67%3
Nov 18, 20089.55%4
Jan 20, 20099.44%6
Dec 1, 20089.39%2
Sep 17, 20019.21%29

Frequently asked questions

What is the daily win rate for Ralph Lauren (RL)?

Historically, Ralph Lauren (RL) closed green on 49.5% of trading days (3589 green, 3578 red, 81 flat), using dividend-adjusted closes and a ±0.01% threshold for green vs red.

What is the current winning or losing streak for Ralph Lauren (RL)?

As of 2026-04-07, Ralph Lauren (RL) is on a 1-day losing streak (consecutive green or red days by the same rules, ignoring trailing flat days).

What does Steady, Balanced, or Explosive mean for Ralph Lauren (RL)?

We label Ralph Lauren (RL) as "balanced" based on the sample standard deviation of daily returns: Moderate daily swings — neither calm nor dramatic.

What were the best and worst single trading days for Ralph Lauren (RL)?

Largest single-day gain: +19.80%. Largest single-day loss: 22.16%. Tables on this page list the top record green and red days.

What counts as an "extreme" daily move for Ralph Lauren (RL)?

We treat a day as extreme if the absolute dividend-adjusted daily return exceeds 3%. About 15.5% of trading days for Ralph Lauren (RL) were extreme (592 up, 529 down).

Data & methodology

How are green, red, and flat days defined?

We use dividend-adjusted (or close-to-close for non-equity) daily returns. Green: return ≥ +0.01%. Red: return ≤ −0.01%. Flat: between those bounds.

How is the current streak calculated?

We count consecutive green or consecutive red days using the same thresholds. If the most recent session is flat, we skip trailing flat days and measure from the last non-flat close.

What does “vs S&P 500” mean?

On sessions where the S&P 500 (^GSPC) was green, we report how often this stock was also green. Shown only for USD equities when benchmark data exists and the symbol is not the index itself.

Where does the archetype come from?

Sample standard deviation of daily returns: low → Steady, high → Explosive, otherwise Balanced. Labels describe typical daily volatility, not quality of the investment.